Present:- Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar Advocate Vs. Satpal Soni and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1126836
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnFeb-11-2014
AppellantPresent:- Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar Advocate
RespondentSatpal Soni and Another
Excerpt:
rathore poonam 2014.02.17 10:32 in the high court of punjab and haryana at i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh t.a.no.463 of 2013 (o&m) date of decision:- 11.02.2014 meenakshi devi ....petitioner(s) versus satpal soni and another ....respondent(s) *** coram:- hon'ble mr.justice mahesh grover *** present:- mr.ashok kumar khubbar, advocate, for the petitioner. none for the respondents. *** mahesh grover, j. (oral) there is no representation on behalf of the respondents despite service. the petitioner states that the respondents have initiated proceedings under section 25 read with section 12 of the guardian and wards act, 1890 and sections 6 and 13 of the hindu minority and guardianship act at fatehgarh sahib. the petitioner averred in the petition that she is a widow and has a minor child to take care of and, therefore, it is extremely difficult for her to travel from yamuna nagar to fatehgarh sahib. convenience of the parties to the litigation is one of the valid grounds for transfer of the proceedings from one place to another. the petitioner, who is a lady and has a minor child to take care of, would, therefore, be greatly inconvenienced in case the proceedings are permitted to go on at fatehgarh sahib. the averments made in the petition have gone uncontroverted rathore poonam t.a.no.463 of 2013 (o&m) -2- 2014.02.17 10:32 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document as there is no representation on behalf of the respondents. consequently, the petition is accepted and the proceedings regarding the case initiated by the respondents titled as satpal soni and another versus meenakshi devi under section 25 read with section 12 of the guardian and wards act, 1890 and sections 6 and 13 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, which are pending in the court of civil judge (sr.division).fatehgarh sahib are directed to be transferred to the court of competent jurisdiction at yamuna nagar. february 11, 2014 ( mahesh grover) poonam judge
Judgment:

Rathore Poonam 2014.02.17 10:32 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH T.A.No.463 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 11.02.2014 Meenakshi Devi ....Petitioner(s) versus Satpal Soni and another ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER *** Present:- Mr.Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

None for the respondents.

*** MAHESH GROVER, J.

(Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the respondents despite service.

The petitioner states that the respondents have initiated proceedings under Section 25 read with Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 and Sections 6 and 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act at Fatehgarh Sahib.

The petitioner averred in the petition that she is a widow and has a minor child to take care of and, therefore, it is extremely difficult for her to travel from Yamuna Nagar to Fatehgarh Sahib.

Convenience of the parties to the litigation is one of the valid grounds for transfer of the proceedings from one place to another.

The petitioner, who is a lady and has a minor child to take care of, would, therefore, be greatly inconvenienced in case the proceedings are permitted to go on at Fatehgarh Sahib.

The averments made in the petition have gone uncontroverted Rathore Poonam T.A.No.463 of 2013 (O&M) -2- 2014.02.17 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document as there is no representation on behalf of the respondents.

Consequently, the petition is accepted and the proceedings regarding the case initiated by the respondents titled as Satpal Soni and another versus Meenakshi Devi under Section 25 read with Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 and Sections 6 and 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, which are pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr.Division).Fatehgarh Sahib are directed to be transferred to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Yamuna Nagar.

February 11, 2014 ( MAHESH GROVER) poonam JUDGE