Sarabjit Kaur and Another Vs. State of Punjab and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1121427
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnDec-31-2013
AppellantSarabjit Kaur and Another
RespondentState of Punjab and Others
Excerpt:
crm no.m-44335 of 2013 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh crl. misc. no.m- 44335 of 2013(o&m) date of decision: december 31, 2013. sarabjit kaur and another .....petitioner(s) versus state of punjab and others .....respondent (s) coram:- hon'ble mr.justice ram chand gupta present: petitioners in person with ms.amandeep sibia, advocate, for the petitioners.***** ram chand gupta, j.(oral) heard. learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if commissioner of police, ludhiana i.e.respondent no.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 30.12.2013 (annexure p-5).made to him by the petitioners.as per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. date of birth of petitioner no.1- sarabjit kaur, as per copy of school leaving certificate, annexure p-1, is 02.09.1994 and date of birth of petitioner no.2 –arpanjot singh as per copy of certificate of matriculation examination, annexure p-2, is 08.11.1989. they got married on 30.12.2013 singh omkar 2014.01.08 10:23 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh crm no.m-44335 of 2013 2 as per certificate, annexure p-3. photographs of the marriage are annexure p-4. in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 - i.e.commissioner of police, ludhiana to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 30.12.2013 (annexure p-5) as already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.however, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law. ( ram chand gupta ) december 31, 2013. judge ‘om’ singh omkar 2014.01.08 10:23 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh
Judgment:

CRM No.M-44335 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.

Misc.

No.M- 44335 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2013.

Sarabjit Kaur and another .....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others .....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in person with Ms.Amandeep Sibia, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana i.e.respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 30.12.2013 (Annexure P-5).made to him by the petitioneRs.As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major.

Date of birth of petitioner No.1- Sarabjit Kaur, as per copy of School Leaving Certificate, Annexure P-1, is 02.09.1994 and date of birth of petitioner No.2 –Arpanjot Singh as per copy of certificate of Matriculation Examination, Annexure P-2, is 08.11.1989.

They got married on 30.12.2013 Singh Omkar 2014.01.08 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM No.M-44335 of 2013 2 as per Certificate, Annexure P-3.

Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P-4.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - i.e.Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 30.12.2013 (Annexure P-5) as already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioneRs.However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.

( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) December 31, 2013.

JUDGE ‘om’ Singh Omkar 2014.01.08 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh