Raj Kumar Vs. the State - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1097907
SubjectLand Acquisition
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided OnNov-21-2013
JudgeS. P. Garg
AppellantRaj Kumar
RespondentThe State
Excerpt:
* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on :27. h september, 2013 decided on :21. t november, 2013 + crl.a. 352/2003 sher singh ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state (delhi administration) ..... respondent through : mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. + crl.a. 258/2003 sudesh ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state (govt. of nct of delhi) ..... respondent through : mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. + crl.a.299/2003 raj kumar ..... appellant through : mr.madhu mukul tripathi, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state through : crl.a.no.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... respondent mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. page 1 of 2 and + crl.a. 422/2003 sarfraj ..... appellant through : mr.mukul sharma, advocate along with appellant in person. versus the state through : ..... respondent mr.lovkesh sawhney, app. coram: hon’ble mr. justice s.p.garg s.p.garg, j.the present appeals are allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of crl.a.no.232/2003 titled ‘kamlesh kumar @ k.k. vs. the state (government of n.c.t. of delhi)’. (s.p.garg) judge november21 2013/tr
Judgment:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :

27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :

21. t NOVEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 352/2003 SHER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 258/2003 SUDESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A.299/2003 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.352/2003 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. Page 1 of 2 AND + CRL.A. 422/2003 SARFRAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukul Sharma, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.

The present appeals are allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.232/2003 titled ‘Kamlesh Kumar @ K.K. vs. The State (Government of N.C.T. of Delhi)’. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE NOVEMBER21 2013/tr