Present:- Mr. Harpreet Chawla Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1091245
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnSep-17-2013
AppellantPresent:- Mr. Harpreet Chawla Advocate
RespondentState of Haryana and Others
Excerpt:
in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh crm no.m-24942 of 2013 date of decision:17.09.2013 neha and another ....petitioners versus state of haryana and others ....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice amol rattan singh present:- mr.harpreet chawla, advocate for the petitioners.mr.b.s.saini, sr.dag, haryana. amol rattan singh, j (oral) in response to notice issued on 01.08.2013, mr.b.s.saini, sr.dag, haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3 and has filed the reply, to the effect that the petitioners are not staying at the address given in the petition and the mother of petitioner no.2 has also stated that her son has not contacted her and she has no knowledge about the present address of petitioners.father of petitioner no.1 has stated that he has no objection to this marriage and that no birth certificate of petitioner no.1-neha is available in the house. it has been verified by respondents that neha is above 18 years of age, as her date of birth is 23.5.1993, as submitted in the affidavit of the deputy superintendent of police, headquarters.yamunanagar. the petitioners.who are present in the court, submit that petitioner no.1 has not been threatened whereas petitioner no.2 has been threatened on telephone by father of petitioner no.1, stating that in case he visits yamunanagar, he will be killed. kadian savita 2013.09.20 11:23 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm no.m-24942 of 2013 -2- this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents no.2 and 3 to ensure that in case the petitioners need protection when they come to visit the parental house, of either petitioner no.1 or petitioner no.2, they would be given protection by the superintendent of police, yamuna nagar and sho police station, city yamunanagar . september 17, 2013 (amol rattan singh) savita judge kadian savita 2013.09.20 11:23 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-24942 of 2013 Date of decision:17.09.2013 Neha and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr.Harpreet Chawla, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.B.S.Saini, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J (ORAL) In response to notice issued on 01.08.2013, Mr.B.S.Saini, Sr.DAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and has filed the reply, to the effect that the petitioners are not staying at the address given in the petition and the mother of petitioner No.2 has also stated that her son has not contacted her and she has no knowledge about the present address of petitioneRs.Father of petitioner No.1 has stated that he has no objection to this marriage and that no birth certificate of petitioner No.1-Neha is available in the house.

It has been verified by respondents that Neha is above 18 years of age, as her date of birth is 23.5.1993, as submitted in the affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, HeadquarteRs.Yamunanagar.

The petitioneRs.who are present in the Court, submit that petitioner No.1 has not been threatened whereas petitioner No.2 has been threatened on telephone by father of petitioner No.1, stating that in case he visits Yamunanagar, he will be killed.

Kadian Savita 2013.09.20 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM No.M-24942 of 2013 -2- This petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure that in case the petitioners need protection when they come to visit the parental house, of either petitioner No.1 or petitioner No.2, they would be given protection by the Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar and SHO Police Station, City Yamunanagar .

September 17, 2013 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) savita JUDGE Kadian Savita 2013.09.20 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh