Cole Vs. Texas - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/107180
SubjectEducation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnMar-18-1991
Case Number499 U.S. 1301
AppellantCole
RespondentTexas
Excerpt:
cole v. texas - 499 u.s. 1301 (1991) u.s. supreme court cole v. texas, 499 u.s. 1301 (1991) cole v. texas no. a-704 decided march 18, 1991 499 u.s. 1301 on application for stay of execution of sentence of death justice scalia, circuit justice. i have before me an application for a stay of execution pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas. the petitioner seeks direct review of the judgment of the texas courts affirming his death sentence. i will in this case, and in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this court of the petition for certiorari. while i will not extend the time for filing a petition beyond an established execution date, see madden v. texas, 498 u. s. 1301 (1991) (scalia, j., in chambers), neither will i permit the state's execution date to interfere with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this court. it is so ordered.
Judgment:
Cole v. Texas - 499 U.S. 1301 (1991)
U.S. Supreme Court Cole v. Texas, 499 U.S. 1301 (1991)

Cole v. Texas

No. A-704

Decided March 18, 1991

499 U.S. 1301

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF SENTENCE OF DEATH

JUSTICE SCALIA, Circuit Justice.

I have before me an application for a stay of execution pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. The petitioner seeks direct review of the judgment of the Texas courts affirming his death sentence.

I will in this case, and in every capital case on direct review, grant a stay of execution pending disposition by this Court of the petition for certiorari. While I will not extend the time for filing a petition beyond an established execution date, see Madden v. Texas, 498 U. S. 1301 (1991) (SCALIA, J., in chambers), neither will I permit the State's execution date to interfere with the orderly processing of a petition on direct review by this Court.

It is so ordered.