Present : Mr. Jagbir Malik Advocate Vs. Board of School Education Haryana Bhiwani and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1071110
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnMar-04-2013
AppellantPresent : Mr. Jagbir Malik Advocate
RespondentBoard of School Education Haryana Bhiwani and Others
Excerpt:
in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh civil writ petition no.4330 of 2013 date of decision:4. 3.2013 prem parkash .....petitioner. versus board of school education haryana bhiwani & others .....respondents. coram : hon'ble mr.justice rameshwar singh malik present : mr.jagbir malik, advocate for the petitioner. **** rameshwar singh malik j. (oral) feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, the petitioner has approached this court, by way of instant petition under article 226/227 of the constitution of india, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he approached the respondent authorities by way of self contained representation dated 7.12.2012 (annexure p-3).but the same is also pending decision. he further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.1 is directed to examine, consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by passing an appropriate order, keeping in view the textbooks, annexures p-4 to p-6 as well as the judgment passed by the hon'ble supreme court in kanpur university and others versus samir gupta and others 1983 air (sc) 1230. civil writ petition no.4330 o”2. having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, if any, board of school educaiton haryana bhiwani through its secretary-respondent no.1 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner, which prima facie seems to be genuine and decide his representation dated 7.12.2012 (annexure p- 3).by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. respondent no.1 is further directed that while deciding the representation of the petitioner, decision of the hon'ble supreme court referred to above as well as the textbooks annexures p- 4 to p-6, shall be kept in view. with the observations made above, the present petition stands disposed of. (rameshwar singh malik) judge 4 3.2013 ak sharma
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4330 of 2013 Date of Decision:

4. 3.2013 Prem Parkash .....Petitioner.

versus Board of School Education Haryana Bhiwani & others .....Respondents.

CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr.Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.

(ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he approached the respondent authorities by way of self contained representation dated 7.12.2012 (Annexure P-3).but the same is also pending decision.

He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.1 is directed to examine, consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by passing an appropriate order, keeping in view the textbooks, Annexures P-4 to P-6 as well as the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kanpur University and others versus Samir Gupta and others 1983 AIR (SC) 1230.

Civil Writ Petition No.4330 o”

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, if any, Board of School Educaiton Haryana Bhiwani through its Secretary-respondent No.1 is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner, which prima facie seems to be genuine and decide his representation dated 7.12.2012 (Annexure P- 3).by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Respondent No.1 is further directed that while deciding the representation of the petitioner, decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court referred to above as well as the textbooks Annexures P- 4 to P-6, shall be kept in view.

With the observations made above, the present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 4 3.2013 Ak Sharma