Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1064191
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnSep-18-2013
AppellantPresent: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Advocate
RespondentState of Punjab
Excerpt:
criminal misc. not m-31214 o”1. in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh criminal misc. not m-31214 of 2013 date of decision:18. 09.2013. karanjit singh virk ..petitioner versus state of punjab ..respondent coram: hon'ble mrs.justice daya chaudhary present: mr.ajay pal singh, advocate, for the petitioner. daya chaudhary, j. (oral) the present petition has been filed under section 438 cr.p.c.for grant of pre-arrest bail in case fir no.207 dated 16.07.2013 registered under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-b of indian penal code, registered at police station kotwali, patiala. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case whereas he is not involved in the case. a bare perusal of contents of the fir shows that no specific allegation has been alleged against the petitioner. learned counsel also submits that allegations are against other accused and only because of section 120-b ipc, the present petitioner has been implicated in the case. heard arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and have also perused the contents of the fir and order passed by rani neetu 2013.09.21 13:54 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. not m-31214 o”2. the lower court whereby bail of the petitioner was declined. admittedly, specific allegations are there that all accused persons in connivance with each other forged some documents and a false bank account was also managed on the basis of those forged documents. an inquiry was also conducted by superintendent of police (d).patiala wherein it was found that the present petitioner in connivance with parmanand kansal firstly had got opened bank account in indian bank at patiala and got `1,68,000/- from the complainant and thereafter, forged sanction letter of punjab and sind bank, which was sent to australia through e-mail for extension of visa of the daughter of the complainant. keeping in view the seriousness of the offence and the role of the present petitioner, no ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. hence the petition is dismissed. 18.09.2013 (daya chaudhary) neetu judge rani neetu 2013.09.21 13:54 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Judgment:

Criminal Misc.

not M-31214 o”

1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.

not M-31214 of 2013 Date of decision:

18. 09.2013.

Karanjit Singh Virk ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present: Mr.Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Daya Chaudhary, J.

(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.for grant of pre-arrest bail in case FIR No.207 dated 16.07.2013 registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Patiala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case whereas he is not involved in the case.

A bare perusal of contents of the FIR shows that no specific allegation has been alleged against the petitioner.

Learned counsel also submits that allegations are against other accused and only because of Section 120-B IPC, the present petitioner has been implicated in the case.

Heard arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and have also perused the contents of the FIR and order passed by Rani Neetu 2013.09.21 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.

not M-31214 o”

2. the Lower Court whereby bail of the petitioner was declined.

Admittedly, specific allegations are there that all accused persons in connivance with each other forged some documents and a false Bank account was also managed on the basis of those forged documents.

An inquiry was also conducted by Superintendent of Police (D).Patiala wherein it was found that the present petitioner in connivance with Parmanand Kansal firstly had got opened Bank account in Indian Bank at Patiala and got `1,68,000/- from the complainant and thereafter, forged sanction letter of Punjab and Sind Bank, which was sent to Australia through e-mail for extension of visa of the daughter of the complainant.

Keeping in view the seriousness of the offence and the role of the present petitioner, no ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Hence the petition is dismissed.

18.09.2013 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Rani Neetu 2013.09.21 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh