Appellant Vs. Respondent - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1061611
SubjectEducation
CourtKolkata High Court
Decided OnJun-13-2013
JudgeHarish Tandon
AppellantAppellant
RespondentRespondent
Excerpt:
order sheet ca no.256 of 2013 in the high court at calcutta original jurisdiction original side in the matter of: shree sanyeej.steel and power limited before: the hon'ble justice harish tandon date :13. h june, 2013. appearance: mr.m.s.tewari, adv.the court : the company prays for a sanction of the scheme under section 391 of the companies act for payment of the dues to its credit ors.although the scheme, prima facie, proposes to have been restricted to the unsecured creditors but it also suggests some modalities for payment of the dues of the secured creditors as well. the company is directed to hold a meeting of its credit ors.both secured and unsecured, which shall be convened and held at 21, hemant basu sarani, kolkata
Judgment:

ORDER

SHEET CA No.256 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF: SHREE SANYEEJ.STEEL AND POWER LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date :

13. h June, 2013.

Appearance: Mr.M.S.Tewari, Adv.The Court : The company prays for a sanction of the scheme under Section 391 of the Companies Act for payment of the dues to its credit ORS.Although the scheme, prima facie, proposes to have been restricted to the unsecured creditors but it also suggests some modalities for payment of the dues of the secured creditors as well.

The company is directed to hold a meeting of its credit ORS.both secured and unsecured, which shall be convened and held at 21, Hemant Basu Sarani, Kolkata