Criminal Misc.No. M-39230 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. State of Haryana - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1056411
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnJan-28-2013
AppellantCriminal Misc.No. M-39230 of 2012 (Oandm)
RespondentState of Haryana
Excerpt:
crm not m-39230 of 2012 (o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh criminal misc.not m-39230 of 2012 (o&m) date of decision:-28.1.2013 arun ...petitioner versus state of haryana ...respondent coram: hon'ble mr.justice mehinder singh sullar present:- mr.mahesh sangwan, advocate for the petitioner. mr.gourav verma, aag haryana for the respondent. mehinder singh sullar, j. (oral) petitioner arun son of madan has preferred the instant petition for the grant of regular bail, in a case registered against him, by way of fir no.600 dated 16.9.2012 (annexure p1).for the commission of offences punishable under sections 379, 411, 420, 467, 468 and 471 ipc by the police of police station city, bhiwani, invoking the provisions of section 439 cr.pc.”2. notice of the petition was issued to the state.”3. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition for regular bail deserves to be accepted in this respect.”4. as is evident from the record that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the court of magistrate. he was arrested on 16.9.2012, since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful crm not m-39230 of 2012 (o&m) 2 purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. there is no history of his previous involvement in any other criminal case. even, since the charges have not yet been framed against the petitioner, so, the final conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time.”5. in the light of aforesaid reasons, taking into consideration the totality of the facts & circumstances, emanated from the record, as narrated here-in-above, the instant petition for regular bail is accepted. the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. 28.1.2013 (mehinder singh sullar) as judge
Judgment:

CRM not M-39230 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.not M-39230 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:-28.1.2013 Arun ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.Mahesh Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Gourav Verma, AAG Haryana for the respondent.

Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.

(Oral) Petitioner Arun son of Madan has preferred the instant petition for the grant of regular bail, in a case registered against him, by way of FIR No.600 dated 16.9.2012 (Annexure P1).for the commission of offences punishable under sections 379, 411, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC by the police of Police Station City, Bhiwani, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC.”

2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State.”

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and after deep consideration over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition for regular bail deserves to be accepted in this respect.”

4. As is evident from the record that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate.

He was arrested on 16.9.2012, since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful CRM not M-39230 of 2012 (O&M) 2 purpose would be served to further detain him in jail.

There is no history of his previous involvement in any other criminal case.

Even, since the charges have not yet been framed against the petitioner, so, the final conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time.”

5. In the light of aforesaid reasons, taking into consideration the totality of the facts & circumstances, emanated from the record, as narrated here-in-above, the instant petition for regular bail is accepted.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

28.1.2013 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge