Niranjan Singh Vs. Ajay Tirki - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1053883
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnJun-27-2013
AppellantNiranjan Singh
RespondentAjay Tirki
Excerpt:
1 c.p.no.1071/2012 27/06/2013 shri   narendra   sharm a   learned   counsel   for   the  petitio ne r. shri   rajesh   tiwari   learned   co unsel   for   the  respon de n ts. allegin g   disobedience   of  order   dated  19.03.2010  pass ed   in   wp   10966/2009   and   order   dated  21.04.2011   in   contem pt   petitio n   no.1299/2010  pres en t   petitio n   has   been   filed   for   taking   action  agains t  respo ndents. vide   decision   in   writ   petitio n   the   petitio ner   was  to   be   rein stated   as   secretary,   gram   panchayat,  kalm e s ara,   janpad   panchayat   sohagpur   which   he  was   on   19.04. 2011   which   led   to   dropping   of  co nte m pt  proceedings. subs equently,   the   petitioner   was   remo ved   from  the   pos t   of   panchayat   karmi   vide   resolutio n   date d  07/06/2011   whereagainst   petitio ner   preferred   an  appe al   before   sub­ divisional   officer,   so hagpur,   who  by   his   order   dated   03.01.2012,   quashed   the  resolutio n   dated   07.06.2011.   ho wever,   collector,  hos han gabad   vide   order   dated   09.04.2012   had   set  aside   th e   order   of   sub­ divisional   officer   on   the  gro un d  of  jurisdictio n. it  appe ars  that   instead   of   assailing  the   order   by  colle ctor   or   the   resolutio n   by   gram   panchayat,   as  2 c.p.no.1071/2012 the   case   m ay   be,   before   appro priate   forum,   the  petitio ne r  has  filed  this  contem pt  petition. the   given   facts   of   the   case   at   hand,   ho weve r,  does   no.  len d   any   support   to   the   contentio n   of   the  petitio ne r   of   wilf ull   diso bedience.   because   afte r  bein g   rein stated     in   pursuance   to   order   dated  21.04.2011   passed   in   w.p.  10966/2010,   the  petitio ne r   has   been   rem oved   in   a   separate  proc ee din gs   by   the   gram   panchayat,   which   is  assailable   befo re   appropriate   forum   in   accordan c e  with   law.   the   rem edy   however,   is   no.  a   co ntem pt  petitio n. in   vie w   whereo f   the   present   co ntem pt   petitio n  bein g  misc on ceived,  is  dism issed.  no  costs. (sanjay yadav)       judg e anand
Judgment:

1 C.P.No.1071/2012 27/06/2013 Shri   Narendra   Sharm a   learned   counsel   for   the  petitio ne r.

Shri   Rajesh   Tiwari   learned   co unsel   for   the  respon de n ts.

Allegin g   disobedience   of  order   dated  19.03.2010  pass ed   in   WP   10966/2009   and   order   dated  21.04.2011   in   Contem pt   Petitio n   No.1299/2010  pres en t   petitio n   has   been   filed   for   taking   action  agains t  respo ndents.

Vide   decision   in   writ   petitio n   the   petitio ner   was  to   be   rein stated   as   Secretary,   Gram   Panchayat,  Kalm e s ara,   Janpad   Panchayat   Sohagpur   which   he  was   on   19.04.

2011   which   led   to   dropping   of  Co nte m pt  Proceedings.

Subs equently,   the   petitioner   was   remo ved   from  the   pos t   of   Panchayat   Karmi   vide   resolutio n   date d  07/06/2011   whereagainst   petitio ner   preferred   an  appe al   before   Sub­ Divisional   Officer,   So hagpur,   who  by   his   order   dated   03.01.2012,   quashed   the  resolutio n   dated   07.06.2011.

  Ho wever,   Collector,  Hos han gabad   vide   order   dated   09.04.2012   had   set  aside   th e   order   of   Sub­ Divisional   Officer   on   the  gro un d  of  jurisdictio n.

It  appe ars  that   instead   of   assailing  the   order   by  Colle ctor   or   the   resolutio n   by   Gram   Panchayat,   as  2 C.P.No.1071/2012 the   case   m ay   be,   before   appro priate   forum,   the  petitio ne r  has  filed  this  Contem pt  Petition.

The   given   facts   of   the   case   at   hand,   ho weve r,  does   No.  len d   any   support   to   the   contentio n   of   the  petitio ne r   of   wilf ull   diso bedience.

  Because   afte r  bein g   rein stated     in   pursuance   to   order   dated  21.04.2011   passed   in   W.P.  10966/2010,   the  petitio ne r   has   been   rem oved   in   a   separate  proc ee din gs   by   the   Gram   Panchayat,   which   is  assailable   befo re   appropriate   forum   in   accordan c e  with   law.

  The   rem edy   however,   is   No.  a   Co ntem pt  Petitio n.

In   vie w   whereo f   the   present   co ntem pt   petitio n  bein g  misc on ceived,  is  dism issed.

 No  costs.

(SANJAY YADAV)       JUDG E anand