thereafter the Respondent Husband Filed a Petition Under Vs. Parveen Kumar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1052943
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnAug-08-2013
Appellantthereafter the Respondent Husband Filed a Petition Under
RespondentParveen Kumar
Excerpt:
manot kumar t.a.no.377 of 2012 (o&m) #1# 2013.08.13 08:54 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh in the high court for the states of punjab and haryana at chandigarh t.a.no.377 of 2012 (o&m) date of decision:8. 8.2013 neelam rani .....petitioner(s) versus parveen kumar ....respondent(s) coram: hon'ble mr.justice jaswant singh present: mr.manish soni, advocate along with petitioner in person. mr.aarshdeep singh, advocate along with respondent no.1 in person. jaswant singh, j (oral) petitioner-wife is seeking the transfer of the petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (for short “the act”.) titled parveen kumar versus neelam rani from the court of learned district judge, sirs.to a court of competent jurisdiction at karnal. the marriage of the parties was solemnized on 10.4.2000 at karnal and out of their wedlock, one boy named himanshu was born on 18.8.2001. due to matrimonial dispute, it is alleged that the petitioner alongwith minot child was turned out of the matrimonial home at sirsa. petitioner along with minot child is stated to be residing separately at her parental home at karnal. t.a.no.377 of 2012 (o&m) #2# thereafter, the respondent husband filed a petition under section 13 of the act which, as noticed above, is pending in the court of learned district judge, sirsa. it is averred that the petitioner wife is posted as teacher in a govt school at district karnal. it is stated that the distance between sirs.and karnal is about 300 kms and in these circumstances, it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent husband at sirsa. at the time of hearing, the respondent-husband, who is present in court, states that he has no objection if the aforesaid petition is transferred to karnal. in view of the conceded position, the present petition is allowed, the petition under section 13 of the act titled parveen kumar versus neelam rani from the court of learned district judge, sirs.is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the district courts, karnal for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. august 08, 2013 ( jaswant singh ) manot judge
Judgment:

Manot Kumar T.A.No.377 of 2012 (O&M) #1# 2013.08.13 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.377 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:

8. 8.2013 Neelam Rani .....Petitioner(s) Versus Parveen Kumar ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.Manish Soni, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

Mr.Aarshdeep Singh, Advocate along with respondent No.1 in person.

JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner-wife is seeking the transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short “the Act”.) titled Parveen Kumar versus Neelam Rani from the court of learned District Judge, SiRs.to a court of competent jurisdiction at Karnal.

The marriage of the parties was solemnized on 10.4.2000 at Karnal and out of their wedlock, one boy named Himanshu was born on 18.8.2001.

Due to matrimonial dispute, it is alleged that the petitioner alongwith minot child was turned out of the matrimonial home at Sirsa.

Petitioner along with minot child is stated to be residing separately at her parental home at Karnal.

T.A.No.377 of 2012 (O&M) #2# Thereafter, the respondent husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act which, as noticed above, is pending in the Court of learned District Judge, Sirsa.

It is averred that the petitioner wife is posted as Teacher in a Govt School at District Karnal.

It is stated that the distance between SiRs.and Karnal is about 300 kms and in these circumstances, it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent husband at Sirsa.

At the time of hearing, the respondent-husband, who is present in court, states that he has no objection if the aforesaid petition is transferred to Karnal.

In view of the conceded position, the present petition is allowed, the petition under Section 13 of the Act titled Parveen Kumar versus Neelam Rani from the court of learned District Judge, SiRs.is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the District Courts, Karnal for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal.

August 08, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE