Mohammed Rafique Ansari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1050297
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnSep-10-2012
AppellantMohammed Rafique Ansari
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
mohd. rafique & others versus state w.p.no.14765/12 10/09/12 shri vipin yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri amit sharma, learned panel lawyer for the respondents/ state. heard. the grievance of petitioners is that inspite of orders passed under similar circumstances in the case of an employee surendra kumar gupta, similar treatment is denied to the petitioners.petitioners claim grant of appointment on the post of lab assistant in accordance with the circulars and policy of the state government and brings to the notice of this court an order dated 14.10.08 passed in w.p.no.19116/03 (annexure p/4) in which initially in the case of one shri surendra kumar gupta, certain directions were issued by this court and subsequently in contempt petition no.1090/09 certain orders were passed on 16.05.12 (annexure p/5) and in pursuant thereto relief was granted to surendra kumar gupta, petitioners claim similar benefit. keeping in view the aforesaid grounds raised by the petitioners.without entering into the controversy, respondents are directed to examine the case of petitioners in the light of action taken in the case of surendra kumar gupta and a speaking order be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.c.c. as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-
Judgment:

Mohd.

Rafique & Others versus state W.P.No.14765/12 10/09/12 Shri Vipin Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Amit Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/ State.

Heard.

The grievance of petitioners is that inspite of orders passed under similar circumstances in the case of an employee Surendra Kumar Gupta, similar treatment is denied to the petitioneRs.Petitioners claim grant of appointment on the post of Lab Assistant in accordance with the circulars and policy of the State Government and brings to the notice of this Court an Order dated 14.10.08 passed in W.P.No.19116/03 (Annexure P/4) in which initially in the case of one Shri Surendra Kumar Gupta, certain directions were issued by this Court and subsequently in Contempt Petition No.1090/09 certain orders were passed on 16.05.12 (Annexure P/5) and in pursuant thereto relief was granted to Surendra Kumar Gupta, petitioners claim similar benefit.

Keeping in view the aforesaid grounds raised by the petitioneRs.without entering into the controversy, respondents are directed to examine the case of petitioners in the light of action taken in the case of Surendra Kumar Gupta and a speaking order be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.C.C.

as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-