Zohra YasmIn Vs. the State of M.P. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1050293
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnSep-10-2012
AppellantZohra Yasmin
RespondentThe State of M.P.
Excerpt:
w.p.no.23388/2003 10.09.2012 shri hemant kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri yogesh dhande, learned dy. govt. advocate for respondents. it is pointed out by learned dy. govt. advocate that a return has already been filed in the original application along with certain documents to indicate that the petitioner was duly informed about the proceedings, but even after publication of the notice in the newspaper, she has not turned up and, therefore, ultimately a decision was taken to remove her from service. it appears that such a fact was not noted by this court while the order dated 7.5.2012 was passed and a direction was given to the respondents to file the return. in view of the return, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for and is granted two weeks' time to file the rejoinder. list on 4.10.2012 as prayed. (k.k.trivedi) judge. a.praj.
Judgment:

W.P.No.23388/2003 10.09.2012 Shri Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Dy.

Govt.

Advocate for respondents.

It is pointed out by learned Dy.

Govt.

Advocate that a return has already been filed in the Original Application along with certain documents to indicate that the petitioner was duly informed about the proceedings, but even after publication of the notice in the newspaper, she has not turned up and, therefore, ultimately a decision was taken to remove her from service.

It appears that such a fact was not noted by this Court while the order dated 7.5.2012 was passed and a direction was given to the respondents to file the return.

In view of the return, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for and is granted two weeks' time to file the rejoinder.

List on 4.10.2012 as prayed.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge.

A.Praj.