Chandra Prakash Ahirwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1049921
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnJun-25-2013
AppellantChandra Prakash Ahirwar
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
cr.a.no.77/2007 25/6/2013: none appears for the appellant. shri amit pandey, learned panel lawyer for the state. appellant has been convicted to undergo 7 years r.i.and fine of rs.1000/- for having committed an offence under section 394 of ipc, 7 years r.i.for an offence under section 397 of ipc and 3 years r.i.and fine of rs.500/- for an offence under section 25 of arms act. appellant has been convicted on 29.12.2006 along with various other co-accused persons who have filed criminal appeal no.288/2007. appellant has been in custody since commission of offence and is in jail after the judgment was pronounced on 29.12.2006. record indicates that his application for seeking suspension of sentence has been rejected and he has already undergone sentence of more than 7 years and in connected criminal appeal no.288/2007 this court has already disposed of the appeal as the co-accused who have been arrested along with the appellant have already undergone the jail sentence. taking note of the aforesaid, it is directed that in case appellant is not released till date, he be released forthwith as he has already undergone the jail sentence, in case he is not required in any other case. with the aforesaid, this appeal stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra
Judgment:

Cr.A.No.77/2007 25/6/2013: None appears for the appellant.

Shri Amit Pandey, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.

Appellant has been convicted to undergo 7 years R.I.and fine of Rs.1000/- for having committed an offence under Section 394 of IPC, 7 years R.I.for an offence under Section 397 of IPC and 3 years R.I.and fine of Rs.500/- for an offence under Section 25 of Arms Act.

Appellant has been convicted on 29.12.2006 along with various other co-accused persons who have filed Criminal Appeal No.288/2007.

Appellant has been in custody since commission of offence and is in jail after the judgment was pronounced on 29.12.2006.

Record indicates that his application for seeking suspension of sentence has been rejected and he has already undergone sentence of more than 7 years and in connected Criminal Appeal No.288/2007 this Court has already disposed of the appeal as the co-accused who have been arrested along with the appellant have already undergone the jail sentence.

Taking note of the aforesaid, it is directed that in case appellant is not released till date, he be released forthwith as he has already undergone the jail sentence, in case he is not required in any other case.

With the aforesaid, this appeal stands disposed of.

c.c.as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra