Hari Prakas Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1047853
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnAug-24-2012
AppellantHari Prakas Tiwari
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
hari prakash tiwari versus state & ors.w.p.no.12756/2012 24/08/2012 shri prabhakar singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. from   the   records,   it   is   seen   that   initially   vide   order  annexure­p5 dated 12.7.2012, petitioner was transferred on her  own request from one school to another. now on orders from the  minister in­charge of the district and the government, the entire  transfer exercise has been directed to be cancelled with regard to  district panna.  in   view   of   the   above,   as   the   state   government   has  cancelled the entire exercise in accordance with the directions  issued   by   the   minister   concerned,   in   the   absence   of   any  provision, rule or regulation shown to be violated, interference  by   this   court   is   no.  warranted,   as   the   action   impugned  is   an  executive excuse. petitioner may represent to the state government and it  would be for the state government to take action in the matter. finding no case made out for interference on the grounds  raised, the petition is dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge nd
Judgment:

Hari Prakash Tiwari versus State & ORS.W.P.No.12756/2012 24/08/2012 Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

From   the   records,   it   is   seen   that   initially   vide   order  Annexure­P5 dated 12.7.2012, petitioner was transferred on her  own request from one school to another. Now on orders from the  Minister In­charge of the district and the Government, the entire  transfer exercise has been directed to be cancelled with regard to  District Panna.  In   view   of   the   above,   as   the   State   Government   has  cancelled the entire exercise in accordance with the directions  issued   by   the   Minister   concerned,   in   the   absence   of   any  provision, rule or regulation shown to be violated, interference  by   this   Court   is   No.  warranted,   as   the   action   impugned  is   an  executive excuse.

Petitioner may represent to the State Government and it  would be for the State Government to take action in the matter.

Finding no case made out for interference on the grounds  raised, the petition is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd