Amar Sigh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1045606
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnMar-18-2013
AppellantAmar Sigh
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
m.cr.c.no.3481/2013 18.3.2013 shri s.k.karan, advocate for the applicant. shri r.k.kesarwani, pl for the state. this petition has been filed for modification of order dated 7.3.2013 passed in m.cr.c.no.895/2013. learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that due to mistake in the memo of m.cr.c.no.895/2013, name of father of applicant no.2 prahlad was wrongly mentioned as sumat singh in place of guman singh, therefore, the order dated 7.3.2013 be modified to that extent. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is allowed. committal court/trial court is directed to read the name of father of applicant no.2 prahlad as guman singh in place of sumat singh in the order dated 7.3.2013 passed in m.cr.c.no.895/2013. accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (g.s.solanki) judge pb
Judgment:

M.Cr.C.No.3481/2013 18.3.2013 Shri S.K.Karan, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

This petition has been filed for modification of order dated 7.3.2013 passed in M.Cr.C.No.895/2013.

Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that due to mistake in the memo of M.Cr.C.No.895/2013, name of father of applicant No.2 Prahlad was wrongly mentioned as Sumat Singh in place of Guman Singh, therefore, the order dated 7.3.2013 be modified to that extent.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is allowed.

Committal Court/trial Court is directed to read the name of father of applicant No.2 Prahlad as Guman Singh in place of Sumat Singh in the order dated 7.3.2013 passed in M.Cr.C.No.895/2013.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB