Vikas Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1045259
SubjectEducation
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnJul-29-2013
AppellantVikas
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
cr.a.no.884/2012 29.7.2013 as per b.d.rathi,j shri g.s.rajput, advocate for the appellant. shri amit pandey, government advocate for the respondent- state. heard on i.a.no.9052/13, which is an application for releasing the seized motorcycle on supurdginama of applicant rangad, father of appellant. on perusal of the record of the trial court, it is revealed that motorcycle, which is said to be used for committing the offence, was seized from the possession of appellant vikas vide seizure memo (ex.p/13).learned government advocate has opposed the prayer on the ground that the motorcycle be given to its registered owner only. alongwith application, photocopy of certificate of registration of seized vehicle has been filed, indicating that vehicle is registered in the name of appellant vikas. it is submitted on behalf of the applicant that being a joint family, all the members of the family use the vehicle therefore vehicle may be released in favour of rangad. looking to the increasing number of accident and claim cases, we are not inclined to accede to the prayer made by the applicant, who is in jail. the application is, accordingly, dismissed. (ajit singh) (b.d.rathi) judge judge
Judgment:

Cr.A.No.884/2012 29.7.2013 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri G.S.Rajput, Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Amit Pandey, Government Advocate for the respondent- State.

Heard on I.A.No.9052/13, which is an application for releasing the seized Motorcycle on supurdginama of applicant Rangad, father of appellant.

On perusal of the record of the trial Court, it is revealed that Motorcycle, which is said to be used for committing the offence, was seized from the possession of appellant Vikas vide seizure memo (Ex.P/13).Learned Government Advocate has opposed the prayer on the ground that the Motorcycle be given to its registered owner only.

Alongwith application, photocopy of certificate of registration of seized vehicle has been filed, indicating that vehicle is registered in the name of appellant Vikas.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that being a joint family, all the members of the family use the vehicle therefore vehicle may be released in favour of Rangad.

Looking to the increasing number of accident and claim cases, we are not inclined to accede to the prayer made by the applicant, who is in jail.

The application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(AJIT SINGH) (B.D.RATHI) JUDGE JUDGE