Manisha Lalwani Vs. D.V.Paul - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1045152
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnDec-13-2012
AppellantManisha Lalwani
RespondentD.V.Paul
Excerpt:
1....m.c.c.no.1282 o”13. 12.2012 shri mohd. ali, counsel for the applicant. shri arun kumar choubey, counsel for the respondents. this application is filed for modification of order dated 16.9.2011 in which the prayer of the applicant is for transfer of the case to some other court, as the court below is unable to decide the case as directed by this court. from the perusal of the order dated 16.9.2011, we find that the time period for deciding the case was extended on the prayer of the second civil judge, class ii, katni for deciding the civil suit no.53/09, pending between the parties. it is also brought to our notice that applicant has already moved an application under section 24 of the c.p.c.for the transfer of the aforesaid case to some other court. in view of the aforesaid factual position, no further action is required in the matter. the application is dismissed. however, applicant shall be at liberty to press her prayer in m.c.c.1159 of 2011, which will be considered in accordance with law. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge vj
Judgment:

1....M.C.C.No.1282 o”

13. 12.2012 Shri Mohd.

Ali, Counsel for the applicant.

Shri Arun Kumar Choubey, Counsel for the respondents.

This application is filed for modification of order dated 16.9.2011 in which the prayer of the applicant is for transfer of the case to some other Court, as the court below is unable to decide the case as directed by this Court.

From the perusal of the order dated 16.9.2011, we find that the time period for deciding the case was extended on the prayer of the Second Civil Judge, Class II, Katni for deciding the Civil Suit No.53/09, pending between the parties.

It is also brought to our notice that applicant has already moved an application under Section 24 of the C.P.C.for the transfer of the aforesaid case to some other Court.

In view of the aforesaid factual position, no further action is required in the matter.

The application is dismissed.

However, applicant shall be at liberty to press her prayer in M.C.C.1159 of 2011, which will be considered in accordance with law.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj