Piyush Kumar JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1044602
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnFeb-06-2013
AppellantPiyush Kumar Jain
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
m.cr.c.no.255/2013 6.2.2013 shri paritosh trivedi, counsel for the petitioner. shri v.k.lakhera, pl for the state/respondent no.1. shri mahendra pateriya, counsel for the respondent no.2. arguments heard. the petitioner has filed this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing the fir dated 10.6.2011 registered as crime no.529/2011 by the police of police station kotwali, district damoh for offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468 of ipc on the ground that petitioner has submitted the forged documents for appointment to the post of samvida shala shikshak grade-iii. learned counsel for the university/respondent no.2 has submitted that due to oversight of university authorities, it has been informed to the concerned department that documents submitted by the petitioner are forged as there were other persons of similar name. not on perusal of record, the university authority has informed the petitioner that the documents submitted by him are not forged. considering the averment of fir registered as crime no.529/2011 against the petitioner, is hereby quashed. the petition is allowed accordingly. (a.k.sharma) judge ravi
Judgment:

M.Cr.C.No.255/2013 6.2.2013 Shri Paritosh Trivedi, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri V.K.Lakhera, PL for the State/respondent No.1.

Shri Mahendra Pateriya, counsel for the respondent No.2.

Arguments heard.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the FIR dated 10.6.2011 registered as Crime No.529/2011 by the police of Police Station Kotwali, District Damoh for offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 of IPC on the ground that petitioner has submitted the forged documents for appointment to the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-III.

Learned counsel for the University/respondent No.2 has submitted that due to oversight of university authorities, it has been informed to the concerned department that documents submitted by the petitioner are forged as there were other persons of similar name.

not on perusal of record, the university authority has informed the petitioner that the documents submitted by him are not forged.

Considering the averment of FIR registered as Crime No.529/2011 against the petitioner, is hereby quashed.

The petition is allowed accordingly.

(A.K.Sharma) JUDGE ravi