VipIn Chourasia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1043586
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnApr-29-2013
AppellantVipIn Chourasia
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
w.p.no.6683/13 29/04/13 shri d.k.tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners.shri rajesh tiwari, learned govt. adv.for respondents no.1, 2 and 3. shri r.p.agrawal, learned sr.counsel with shri sanjay agrawal, learned counsel for respondent no.4. against the order passed by the collector under section 247 of the m.p.l.r.c., petitioners have a remedy of filing an appeal under section 242, second appeal and revision under section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioners to take recours.to the remedy available under the m.p.l.r.c., this petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-
Judgment:

W.P.No.6683/13 29/04/13 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt.

Adv.for respondents No.1, 2 and 3.

Shri R.P.Agrawal, learned Sr.Counsel with Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

Against the order passed by the Collector under Section 247 of the M.P.L.R.C., petitioners have a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 242, Second Appeal and Revision under Section 50 and, therefore, the petition directly before this Court by-passing a three tier remedy is not permissible.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioners to take recouRs.to the remedy available under the M.P.L.R.C., this petition is disposed of.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Vy/-