Hiralal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1040391
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnMar-19-2013
AppellantHiralal
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
m.cr.c.no.189/2013 19.3.2013 shri vikas mahavar, advocate for the applicant. shri chandrakant mishra, pl for the state. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c.for grant of bail. the applicant is in custody since 5.11.2012 in connection with crime no.18/2012 registered at p.s.raj nagar, district chhatarpur for the offence punishable under sections 307, 294, 506-b and 336 read with 34 of the ipc and 25/27 of the arms act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. co-accused prem chand has already been released on bail. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. i have perused the case diary. there is direct allegation against the applicant that he fired on sarju, who sustained gunshot injuries. in these circumstances, i do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. application is hereby dismissed. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb
Judgment:

M.Cr.C.No.189/2013 19.3.2013 Shri Vikas Mahavar, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, PL for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 5.11.2012 in connection with Crime No.18/2012 registered at P.S.Raj Nagar, District Chhatarpur for the offence punishable under sections 307, 294, 506-B and 336 read with 34 of the IPC and 25/27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.

Co-accused Prem Chand has already been released on bail.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

I have perused the case diary.

There is direct allegation against the applicant that he fired on Sarju, who sustained gunshot injuries.

In these circumstances, I do not find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail.

Application is hereby dismissed.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB