Franchise Tax Board of California Vs. United Americans - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/103640
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On1974
Case Number419 U.S. 890
AppellantFranchise Tax Board of California
RespondentUnited Americans
Excerpt:
Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]
franchise tax board of california v. united americans - 419 u.s. 890 (1974) u.s. supreme court franchise tax board of california v. united americans , 419 u.s. 890 (1974) 419 u.s. 890 franchise tax board of the state of california et al. v. united americans for public schools et al. no. 73-1718. supreme court of the united states october 21, 1974 the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice white, joined by the chief justice and mr. justice rehnquist, dissenting. the district court struck down the california statute providing state income-tax reductions for taxpayers sending their children to nonpublic schools. the court summarily affirms this judgment. for the reasons stated in my dissent in committee for public education & religious.....
Judgment:
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED AMERICANS - 419 U.S. 890 (1974)
U.S. Supreme Court FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED AMERICANS , 419 U.S. 890 (1974)

419 U.S. 890

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF the State of CALIFORNIA et al.
v.
UNITED AMERICANS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al.
No. 73-1718.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Supreme Court of the United States

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

October 21, 1974

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

The judgment is affirmed.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Mr. Justice WHITE, joined by THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice REHNQUIST, dissenting.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

The District Court struck down the California statute providing state income-tax reductions for taxpayers sending their children to nonpublic schools. The Court summarily affirms this judgment. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 , 813-824 (1973). I disagree and respectfully dissent.[ Franchise Tax Board of California v. United Americans 419 U.S. 890 (1974) ]

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]