Snigdha Vs. Birla Institute of Technology Through Its Vice Chancellor and ors - Court Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ContemptCase(Civil)No.596of2013 Snigdha .... Petitioner Versus BirlaInstituteofTechnologyandors.....RespondentsOppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SumeetGadodia FortheRespondents/Opp.Parties :M/s.JaiPrakash,AAG& RishiPallava 423.8.2013 After hearing learned counselfor the parties, itappears that interimorderdated1.7.2013hasbeensubstantiallycompliedwithas thepetitionerhasbeenprovisionallyadmittedinthethirdsemester courseandhadalsobeenallowedtoappearinthequizexamination held periodically during the course. However, the petitioner has an apprehension that since the respondentsopposite parties have not accepted the examination fee, she may be again prevented from appearingintheendsemesterexaminationscheduledtobeheldin October,2013. However,itappearsthattherespondentshaveearlierbyvirtue ofaninterimorderpassedinfavourofthepetitioner,notonlyallowed hertobeadmittedinthesecondsemestercoursebutalsoadmitted her to sit in the end semester examination, though provisionally subjecttotheoutcomeofthe writpetition.Theyalsoappearedto haveacceptedtheexaminationfeeforthesecondsemestercourse,at therelevantpointoftime. Thereisnoreasonwhytherespondents shouldnotfollowthesamecourse,asthepresentinterimorderalso waspassedinthesametermsastheearlierinterimorder,inthecaseof thepetitionerinthependingwritpetition. Learnedcounselfortherespondentsoppositepartiessubmits thatthewritpetitionitselfmaybedecidedatanearlydatesothatthe issuesraisedbythepetitionermaybefinallyadjudicated. Forthattherespondentsoppositepartiesareatlibertytomake aprayerbeforeanappropriateBenchwherethewritpetitionis 2. pending. Since,itappearsthattheinterimorderdated1.7.2013hasbeen substantiallycompliedwith,thecontemptproceedingisdroppedwith theobservationmadehereinabove. (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) Pandey