Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1024894
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-23-2013
AppellantAjay Kumar Gupta
RespondentState of Jharkhand and ors.
Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.3882of2005 ajaykumargupta ..... petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand&ors. . respondents coram: honblemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar forthepetitioner :mr.k.p.deo,advocate fortherespondents :mrs.swetasingh,j.c.tog.p.i i.a.no.5919of2013 8/23.08.2013 thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenfiledbythe petitionerseekingamendmentintheprayerclauseofthewritpetition whichreadsasunder: and in alternative, direction may be given to respondentauthoritiestopaythepetitionerthepost retiralbenefitsasthepetitionerhasjoinedservice onthepostofassistantteacheron03.10.1983in pursuant to the advertisement issued by the competent authority i.e., the then district superintendentofeducation,sahibganjonvacant sanctioned post and worked continuously since 30.06.2005andwasalsogivenpromotionbythe respondent authorities vide memo no. 456269, sahibganj, dated 01.07.1994 and thereafter, petitionerwasremovedfromservicevidememono. 753, pakur, dated 30.06.2005, issued by district superintendent of educationcumsub divisional officer, pakur although in the course of his 22 yearsofservicepetitionerhasacquiredfirstrankin the examination conducted by primary teachers training college, barihat, sahebganj in the year 1994.2. heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedcounselappearingfortherespondents.2.3. itisthecaseofthepetitionerthathewasappointedas assistantteacheron03.10.1983pursuanttotheadvertisementissued by the respondents and thereafter, he worked continuously on the saidposttill30.06.2005.4. learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmitsthatthesefacts have been mentioned in the writ petition and in view of the facts alreadystatedinthewritpetition,theamendmentassoughtthrough thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationwouldnotchangethenatureof the case nor it would cause any prejudice to the respondents and thus,suchamendmentcanbeallowed.5. learnedcounselappearingfortherespondentsisalsonot in a position to dispute the facts stated in the interlocutory application.6. inviewoftheaforesaid,i.a.no.5919of2013isallowed. w.p.(s)no.3882of2005 7. let necessary amendment be carried out in the writ petitionwithinaperiodofoneweek.8. vide order dated 28.06.2013, the respondent no.6 was directedtofileanaffidavit. againbyorderdated19.07.2013,one morechancewasgrantedforfilingsuchanaffidavithowever,tilldate nosuchaffidavithasbeenfiledbytherespondentno.6.3. 9. inviewoftheaforesaid,respondentno.6isdirectedtobe presentinthecourtat10.30amonthenextdateofhearing.10. inthemeantime,anaffidavitasdirectedbyorderdated 28.06.2013maybefiled.11. postthematteron6thseptember,2013.12. letacopyofthisorderbesenttotheprincipalsecretary, human resource development department, government of jharkhand.13. letacopyofthisorderbegiventothecounselappearing fortheparties. (shreechandrashekhar,j.) r.k.
Judgment:

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3882of2005 AjayKumarGupta ..... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.K.P.Deo,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mrs.SwetaSingh,J.C.toG.P.I I.A.No.5919of2013 8/23.08.2013 Thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenfiledbythe petitionerseekingamendmentintheprayerclauseofthewritpetition whichreadsasunder: and in alternative, direction may be given to respondentauthoritiestopaythepetitionerthepost retiralbenefitsasthepetitionerhasjoinedservice onthepostofAssistantTeacheron03.10.1983in pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Competent authority i.e., the then District SuperintendentofEducation,Sahibganjonvacant sanctioned post and worked continuously since 30.06.2005andwasalsogivenpromotionbythe respondent authorities vide memo no. 456269, Sahibganj, dated 01.07.1994 and thereafter, petitionerwasremovedfromservicevidememono. 753, Pakur, dated 30.06.2005, issued by District Superintendent of EducationcumSub Divisional Officer, Pakur although in the course of his 22 yearsofservicepetitionerhasacquiredfirstrankin the examination conducted by Primary Teachers Training College, Barihat, Sahebganj in the year 1994.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedcounselappearingfortherespondents.

2.

3. Itisthecaseofthepetitionerthathewasappointedas AssistantTeacheron03.10.1983pursuanttotheadvertisementissued by the respondents and thereafter, he worked continuously on the saidposttill30.06.2005.

4. Learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmitsthatthesefacts have been mentioned in the writ petition and in view of the facts alreadystatedinthewritpetition,theamendmentassoughtthrough thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationwouldnotchangethenatureof the case nor it would cause any prejudice to the Respondents and thus,suchamendmentcanbeallowed.

5. Learnedcounselappearingfortherespondentsisalsonot in a position to dispute the facts stated in the interlocutory application.

6. Inviewoftheaforesaid,I.A.No.5919of2013isallowed. W.P.(S)No.3882of2005 7. Let necessary amendment be carried out in the writ petitionwithinaperiodofoneweek.

8. Vide order dated 28.06.2013, the Respondent No.6 was directedtofileanaffidavit. Againbyorderdated19.07.2013,one morechancewasgrantedforfilingsuchanaffidavithowever,tilldate nosuchaffidavithasbeenfiledbytheRespondentNo.6.

3. 9. Inviewoftheaforesaid,RespondentNo.6isdirectedtobe presentintheCourtat10.30AMonthenextdateofhearing.

10. Inthemeantime,anaffidavitasdirectedbyorderdated 28.06.2013maybefiled.

11. Postthematteron6thSeptember,2013.

12. LetacopyofthisorderbesenttothePrincipalSecretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Jharkhand.

13. Letacopyofthisorderbegiventothecounselappearing fortheparties. (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.K.