SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/1024849 |
Court | Jharkhand High Court |
Decided On | Aug-19-2013 |
Appellant | Lakhan Sao Alias Ram Lakhan Sao |
Respondent | The State of Jharkhand |
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 3022 of 2013 lakhan sao @ ram lakhan sao ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr.a.k.upadhyay, advocate. for the state : a.p.p. ------ 7/ 19.08.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. the petitioner has been made accused in connection with patratu p.s. case no. 129 of 2008 corresponding to g.r. no. 2376 of 2008, s.t no.342 (a) of 2010, for the offence under sections 448, 307, 387/34 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act. there is allegation against five unknown persons to have entered the office of the informant and to have made firing. it appears that no one was injured in the occurrence. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the f.i.r. and he has been falsely implicated in this case. learned counsel for the petitioner has, accordingly, prayed for bail. learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, lakhan sao @ ram lakhan sao on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned additional sessions judge-vith, hazaribag, in connection with patratu p.s. case no. 129 of 2008 corresponding to g.r. no. 2376 of 2008, s.t no.342 (a) of 2010. ( h. c. mishra, j.) bs/
Judgment:IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3022 of 2013 Lakhan Sao @ Ram Lakhan Sao ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Upadhyay, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 7/ 19.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 2376 of 2008, S.T No.342 (A) of 2010, for the offence under Sections 448, 307, 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. There is allegation against five unknown persons to have entered the office of the informant and to have made firing. It appears that no one was injured in the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, accordingly, prayed for bail. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Lakhan Sao @ Ram Lakhan Sao on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIth, Hazaribag, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 129 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 2376 of 2008, S.T No.342 (A) of 2010. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) BS/