Md Azizul Ansari Alias Azizul Islam Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1024703
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-20-2013
AppellantMd Azizul Ansari Alias Azizul Islam
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.6695 of 2013 md. azizul ansari @ azizul islam ..... petitioner versus 1. the state of jharkhand 2. gupin hembrom . opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice h.c. mishra for the petitioner : mr. nutan kumari sharma for the state : a. p.p. ----- 7/20.8.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state, as also learned counsel for the complainant. petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 3(1)(x) of the scheduled caste and schedule tribe (prevention of atrocities) act, and sections 323/504/34 of the indian penal code, in connection with p.c.r. case no.289 of 2006, corresponding to special case no.5 of 2007. there is allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the complainant and to have abused him in the name of his tribe. the petitioner was granted provisional bail by order dated 17.7.2013 in view of the ailment of the petitioner, which has been extended till 24.8.2013 by order dated 14.8.2013. in the facts of this case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is hereby, confirmed. (h. c. mishra, j) r.kumar
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6695 of 2013 Md. Azizul Ansari @ Azizul Islam ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Gupin Hembrom . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Nutan Kumari Sharma For the State : A. P.P. ----- 7/20.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the Complainant. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and Sections 323/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with P.C.R. Case No.289 of 2006, corresponding to Special Case No.5 of 2007. There is allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the complainant and to have abused him in the name of his tribe. The petitioner was granted provisional bail by order dated 17.7.2013 in view of the ailment of the petitioner, which has been extended till 24.8.2013 by order dated 14.8.2013. In the facts of this case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is hereby, confirmed. (H. C. Mishra, J) R.Kumar