Jordan Vs. Arizona Ex Rel. Nelson - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/102259
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnOct-13-1969
Case Number396 U.S. 5
AppellantJordan
RespondentArizona Ex Rel. Nelson
Excerpt:
jordan v. arizona ex rel. nelson - 396 u.s. 5 (1969) u.s. supreme court jordan v. arizona ex rel. nelson, 396 u.s. 5 (1969) 396 u.s. 5 jordan v. arizona ex rel. nelson, attorney general appeal from the supreme court of arizona no. 204. decided october 13, 1969 104 ariz. 193, 450 p.2d 383, appeal dismissed. stewart l. udall for appellant. gary k. nelson, attorney general of arizona, appellee, pro se. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. shapiro, v. solman, 396 u.s. 5 (1969) 396 u.s. 5 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court shapiro, v. solman, 396 u.s. 5 (1969) 396 u.s. 5 shapiro, commissioner of welfare of connecticut v. solman et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of connecticut no. 215. decided october 13, 1969 300 f. supp. 409, affirmed. robert k. killian, attorney general of connecticut, and francis j. macgregor, assistant attorney general, for appellant. francis x. dineen for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. see king v. smith, 392 u.s. 309 . page 396 u.s. 5, 6
Judgment:
JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON - 396 U.S. 5 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

JORDAN v. ARIZONA EX REL. NELSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
No. 204.
Decided October 13, 1969

104 Ariz. 193, 450 P.2d 383, appeal dismissed.

Stewart L. Udall for appellant.

Gary K. Nelson, Attorney General of Arizona, appellee, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, <a> 396 U.S. 5 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 5 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court SHAPIRO, v. SOLMAN, 396 U.S. 5 (1969) 396 U.S. 5

SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT v. SOLMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT No. 215.
Decided October 13, 1969

300 F. Supp. 409, affirmed.

Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Francis X. Dineen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 .

Page 396 U.S. 5, 6