King Vs. Greenblatt - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/102248
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnNov-10-1969
Case Number396 U.S. 26
AppellantKing
RespondentGreenblatt
Excerpt:
king v. greenblatt - 396 u.s. 26 (1969) u.s. supreme court king v. greenblatt, 396 u.s. 26 (1969) 396 u.s. 26 king v. greenblatt et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts no. 615, misc. decided november 10, 1969 affirmed. robert h. quinn, attorney general of massachusetts, and john wall and edward w. hanley iii, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. zwicker v. wisconsin, 396 u.s. 26 (1969) 396 u.s. 26 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court zwicker v. wisconsin, 396 u.s. 26 (1969) 396 u.s. 26 zwicker v. wisconsin appeal from the supreme court of wisconsin no. 686, misc. decided november 10, 1969 41 wis. 2d 497, 164 n. w. 2d 512, appeal dismissed. anthony g. amsterdam, michael meltsner, and melvyn zarr for appellant. robert w. warren, attorney general of wisconsin, and william a. platz, sverre o. tinglum, and william f. eich, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 396 u.s. 26, 27
Judgment:
KING v. GREENBLATT - 396 U.S. 26 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court KING v. GREENBLATT, 396 U.S. 26 (1969) 396 U.S. 26

KING v. GREENBLATT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 615, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

Affirmed.

Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, <a> 396 U.S. 26 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 26 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN, 396 U.S. 26 (1969) 396 U.S. 26

ZWICKER v. WISCONSIN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
No. 686, Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969

41 Wis. 2d 497, 164 N. W. 2d 512, appeal dismissed.

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Michael Meltsner, and Melvyn Zarr for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz, Sverre O. Tinglum, and William F. Eich, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 396 U.S. 26, 27