Bhaglu Mahatha and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1020750
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-16-2013
AppellantBhaglu Mahatha and ors
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand ranchi cr. m.p. no. 2059 o”1. bhaglu mahatha 2. sonaram mahatha 3. mukesh mahatha @ mukesh kumar mahatha @ mukesh kumar 4.nunulal bhagat ... ... ... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioners : mr. a.k. sahani for the state : mr. g.s. prasad, a.p.p. ........ 2/16.08.2013 this application has been filed for modification of order dated 11.02.2013, passed in a.b.a. no. 3969 of 2012. it is submitted that petitioners could not surrender within the time stipulated because of non-communication of the order. it appears that present application has been filed after much delay. however, taking into account that petitioners have been granted bail after considering the merit of case, thus, i allow this application and extend the period of surrender by 26th of august 2013 subject to the condition that petitioners jointly deposit a sum of rs. 10,000/- under the heading for legal aid before district legal services authority bokaro and produce a receipt of such deposit in the court below. let this order be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of petitioners. (prashant kumar, j.) binit
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2059 o”

1. Bhaglu Mahatha 2. Sonaram Mahatha 3. Mukesh Mahatha @ Mukesh Kumar Mahatha @ Mukesh Kumar 4.Nunulal Bhagat ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahani For the State : Mr. G.S. Prasad, A.P.P. ........ 2/16.08.2013 This application has been filed for modification of order dated 11.02.2013, passed in A.B.A. No. 3969 of 2012. It is submitted that petitioners could not surrender within the time stipulated because of non-communication of the order. It appears that present application has been filed after much delay. However, taking into account that petitioners have been granted bail after considering the merit of case, Thus, I allow this application and extend the period of surrender by 26th of August 2013 subject to the condition that petitioners jointly deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- under the heading for Legal Aid before District Legal Services Authority Bokaro and produce a receipt of such deposit in the court below. Let this order be communicated to the court below through FAX at the cost of petitioners. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit