Jibardhan Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5935of201313 JibardhanMahto. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.P.S.Dayal,Advocate FortheState : A.P.P. 02/17.08.2013: Thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections302,201and34oftheIndianPenalCode.Subsequently, Section364,396,120Band412oftheIndianPenalCodehave alsobeenadded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case at a latter stage; he is not named in the first information report; he has beenimplicatedinthecaseonlyontheconfessionalstatement ofcoaccusedRanjeetKumarSingh;thepetitionerhasgotno criminalantecedent;heisincustodysinceJanuary,2013;heisa localpermanentresident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. Regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur (Barwadda) P.S. Case No.30 of 2013, correspondingtoG.R.No.239of2013. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/