Radheshyam Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1019040
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-16-2013
AppellantRadheshyam Sao
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand and ors
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cont. case (cvl) no.197 of 2013 radheshyam sao .......... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & ors. ........ opp. parties. ------ coram : honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari ------ for the petitioner : mr. baleshwar yadav for the state : mr. prashant kr. singh ------ 4/16.08.2013: when this case is taken up, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no.2 and 3 submitted that the petitioner's appeal has been disposed of in compliance of the order of this court and the order of this court has been fully complied with. specific statement has been made in the reply regarding the same. the said opposite parties have also tendered unqualified apology for the delay and inconvenience caused to this court. learned counsel for the petitioner also admitted the same. considering that, though belatedly, the order of this court has been fully complied with and the opposite parties have tendered unqualified apology for the delay, the rule against the said opposite parties is discharged. proceeding is dropped. this contempt case stands disposed of. shamim/ (narendra nath tiwari, j.)
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl) No.197 of 2013 Radheshyam Sao .......... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Opp. Parties. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav For the State : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh ------ 4/16.08.2013: When this case is taken up, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no.2 and 3 submitted that the petitioner's appeal has been disposed of in compliance of the order of this Court and the order of this Court has been fully complied with. Specific statement has been made in the reply regarding the same. The said opposite parties have also tendered unqualified apology for the delay and inconvenience caused to this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admitted the same. Considering that, though belatedly, the order of this Court has been fully complied with and the opposite parties have tendered unqualified apology for the delay, the rule against the said opposite parties is discharged. Proceeding is dropped. This contempt case stands disposed of. Shamim/ (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.)