Shaw Vs. Garrison - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/101851
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnDec-09-1968
Case Number393 U.S. 220
AppellantShaw
RespondentGarrison
Excerpt:
shaw v. garrison - 393 u.s. 220 (1968) u.s. supreme court shaw v. garrison, 393 u.s. 220 (1968) 393 u.s. 220 shaw v. garrison et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of louisiana. no. 579. decided december 9, 1968. affirmed. herve racivitch for appellant. eberhard p. deutsch and rene h. himel, jr., for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. the chief justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. landry v. boyle, 393 u.s. 220 (1968) 393 u.s. 220 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court landry v. boyle, 393 u.s. 220 (1968) 393 u.s. 220 landry et al. v. boyle, chief judge, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 659. decided december 9, 1968. 280 f. supp. 938, appeal dismissed. robert l. tucker, r. eugene pincham, jean f. williams, leonard karlin, william m. kunstler, and arthur kinoy for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with rule 13 (1). page 393 u.s. 220, 221
Judgment:
SHAW v. GARRISON - 393 U.S. 220 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAW v. GARRISON, 393 U.S. 220 (1968) 393 U.S. 220

SHAW v. GARRISON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 579.
Decided December 9, 1968.

Affirmed.

Herve Racivitch for appellant.

Eberhard P. Deutsch and Rene H. Himel, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


LANDRY v. BOYLE, <a> 393 U.S. 220 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 220 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court LANDRY v. BOYLE, 393 U.S. 220 (1968) 393 U.S. 220

LANDRY ET AL. v. BOYLE, CHIEF JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 659.
Decided December 9, 1968.

280 F. Supp. 938, appeal dismissed.

Robert L. Tucker, R. Eugene Pincham, Jean F. Williams, Leonard Karlin, William M. Kunstler, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 13 (1).

Page 393 U.S. 220, 221