Vineesh.V Vs. State of Kerala - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1017653
CourtKerala High Court
Decided OnJul-24-2013
JudgeHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
AppellantVineesh.V
RespondentState of Kerala
Excerpt:
in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr.justice s.s.satheesachandran wednesday, the 24th day of july 2013 2nd sravana, 1935 bail appl..no. 4787 of 2013 ------------------------------- crime no. 422/2013 of vattiyoorkavu police station , thiruvananthapuram district .... petitioner/accused no.2: ---------------------------------------------- vineesh.v.,aged 2 years s/o.wilson, panekode, meleputhenveedu, malamugal, kachani.p.o.,thiruvananthapuram-695 018. by adv. sri.n.j.mathews respondent/complainant: ----------------------------------------------- state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, kochi-682 031. by public prosecutor smt. laliza t.y. this bail application having come up for admission on 24-07-2013, the court on the same day passed the following: kss s.s.satheesachandran, j.------------------------------- b.a.no.4787 of 201.() -------------------------------- dated this the 24th day of july, 2013 order ~~~~~~~ previous application moved by petitioner with the other accused in the crime as b.a.no.3540 of 2013 had been dismissed by order dated 5.6.2013. some of the vital points involved in the case showing that the allegations imputed against petitioner to implicate them in the crime are false could not be brought to notice of court earlier, is the submission of counsel to entertain the present application seeking the very same relief of pre-arrest bail again. i find no merit in the submission. previous application had been dismissed holding the accused in the crime including petitioner were not entitled to pre-arrest bail. subsequent application on the plea canvassed as aforesaid is not entertainable. petition is dismissed. sd/- s.s.satheesachandran judge ps/24/7 //true copy// pa to judge
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2013 2ND SRAVANA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 4787 of 2013 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 422/2013 OF VATTIYOORKAVU POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT .... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: ---------------------------------------------- VINEESH.V.,AGED 2 YEARS S/O.WILSON, PANEKODE, MELEPUTHENVEEDU, MALAMUGAL, KACHANI.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 018. BY ADV. SRI.N.J.MATHEWS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA T.Y. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------- B.A.No.4787 OF 201.() -------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of July, 2013 ORDER

~~~~~~~ Previous application moved by petitioner with the other accused in the crime as B.A.No.3540 of 2013 had been dismissed by order dated 5.6.2013. Some of the vital points involved in the case showing that the allegations imputed against petitioner to implicate them in the crime are false could not be brought to notice of Court earlier, is the submission of counsel to entertain the present application seeking the very same relief of pre-arrest bail again. I find no merit in the submission. Previous application had been dismissed holding the accused in the crime including petitioner were not entitled to pre-arrest bail. Subsequent application on the plea canvassed as aforesaid is not entertainable. Petition is dismissed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE ps/24/7 //True copy// PA to Judge