Junas Kiro Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1007997
SubjectEducation
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnJul-30-2013
AppellantJunas Kiro
RespondentState of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi criminalappeal(db)no.322of2013 junaskiro appellant versus thestateofjharkhand respondent coram:hon'blemr.justiced.n.patel :hon'blemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar fortheappellant :mr.bakshivibha,advocate fortherespondent :mr.raviprakash,a.p.p. th 04/dated:30 july,2013 perd.n.patel,j.1. thisappealwasadmittedvideorderdated2ndjuly,2013and record and proceedings of sessions trial no. 123 of 2013 was calledforfromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsfor suspensionofsentence.2. counselappearingfortheappellantisnotpressingtheprayer forsuspensionofsentence.3. learnedcounselforthestatea.p.p.submittedthatthecase ofprosecutionisbaseduponmorethanoneeyewitnesswhoare p.ws2and6.theappellanthascommittedmurderofhiswifein thehouseduringnighthoursandwascaughtredhandedinthe houseitselfandhasadmittedhisguiltwhilerecordingstatement undersection313ofcr.p.c.andthemedicalevidencegivenby p.w.12dr.jitendranathisalsocorroboratingtothedepositions givenbyp.ws2and6.4. lookingtotheprayerofthecounselfortheappellantand alsolookingtotheperiodofcustodyofthisappellant,wehereby directthe registryofthiscourttogetthepaperbooksprepared with neatly typed copies of the depositions of the prosecution witnessesandotherdocuments asrequiredunderrules190and 191ofthejharkhandhighcourtrules,2001 withinaperiodof fourweeksandimmediatelythereafter,thematterwillbelistedfor its 'final hearing' in its seriatum number as per the period of custody. (d.n.patel,j.) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) r.shekhar/amit
Judgment:

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CriminalAppeal(DB)No.322of2013 JunasKiro Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant :Mr.BakshiVibha,Advocate FortheRespondent :Mr.RaviPrakash,A.P.P. th 04/Dated:30 July,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.

1. Thisappealwasadmittedvideorderdated2ndJuly,2013and Record and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 123 of 2013 was calledforfromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsfor suspensionofsentence.

2. Counselappearingfortheappellantisnotpressingtheprayer forsuspensionofsentence.

3. LearnedcounselfortheStateA.P.P.submittedthatthecase ofprosecutionisbaseduponmorethanoneeyewitnesswhoare P.Ws2and6.Theappellanthascommittedmurderofhiswifein thehouseduringnighthoursandwascaughtredhandedinthe houseitselfandhasadmittedhisguiltwhilerecordingstatement underSection313ofCr.P.C.andthemedicalevidencegivenby P.W.12Dr.JitendraNathisalsocorroboratingtothedepositions givenbyP.Ws2and6.

4. Lookingtotheprayerofthecounselfortheappellantand alsolookingtotheperiodofcustodyofthisappellant,wehereby directthe RegistryofthisCourttogetthepaperbooksprepared with neatly typed copies of the depositions of the prosecution witnessesandotherdocuments asrequiredunderRules190and 191oftheJharkhandHighCourtRules,2001 withinaperiodof fourweeksandimmediatelythereafter,thematterwillbelistedfor its 'final hearing' in its seriatum number as per the period of custody. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.Shekhar/Amit