BipIn Kumar Vs. Ranchi Regional Development Au - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1007598
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-13-2013
AppellantBipIn Kumar
RespondentRanchi Regional Development Au
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 6399 of 2011 bipin kumar .... petitioner versus ranchi regional development authority & others ... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. pandey neeraj rai for the respondents :mr. ratnesh kumar i.a. no. 5545 o”08. 13.08.2013 by way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner prays for early hearing of the matter. the petitioner claims for regularization in service under rrda where he was appointed on 1.9.2006 vide annexure-1. according to the petitioner his tenure was subsequently extended by the board by a decision taken on 12.11.2008 contained at annexure-2. learned counsel for the respondent however states that decision for regularization of service is dependant upon the sanction of the state government. in any case at the present, petitioner is out of employment of rrda and his salary has been stopped in 2008 itself. no ground for early hearing are made on behalf of the petitioner in the instant i.a. i.a. no. 5545 of 2013 is therefore, rejected. w.p.s. no. 6399 of 2011 let the matter be listed in its usual course. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6399 of 2011 Bipin Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Ranchi Regional Development Authority & others ... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai For the Respondents :Mr. Ratnesh Kumar I.A. No. 5545 o”

08. 13.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application, petitioner prays for early hearing of the matter. The petitioner claims for regularization in service under RRDA where he was appointed on 1.9.2006 vide Annexure-1. According to the petitioner his tenure was subsequently extended by the Board by a decision taken on 12.11.2008 contained at Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the respondent however states that decision for regularization of service is dependant upon the sanction of the State Government. In any case at the present, petitioner is out of employment of RRDA and his salary has been stopped in 2008 itself. No ground for early hearing are made on behalf of the petitioner in the instant I.A. I.A. No. 5545 of 2013 is therefore, rejected. W.P.S. No. 6399 of 2011 Let the matter be listed in its usual course. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty