| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/1007594 |
| Court | Jharkhand High Court |
| Decided On | Aug-13-2013 |
| Appellant | Saluka Purty |
| Respondent | State of Jharkhand |
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi. cr. appeal (db) no. 1002 of 2008 saluka purty appellant -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand respondent. coram: - honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari. honble mr. justice p.p. bhatt. for the appellant : - mr. r. p. gupta, advocate. for the state : - a.p.p. i.a. (cr.) no. 5584 of 2013 ... 05/13.08.2013 in this interlocutory application, the appellant, above named, has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than seven years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; in view of the period of long custody, the appellant deserves to be released on bail. learned a.p.p. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail but has not disputed the said contentions. regard being had to the period of long custody, the appellant, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, during pendency of the appeal, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned 02nd additional district and sessions judge, singhbhum (w) at chaibasa in connection with sessions trial case no. 121 of 2005/t.r. no. 133 of 2005. i.a. (cr.) no. 5584 of 2013 is disposed of. (narendra nath tiwari, j) (p.p. bhatt, j.) apk
Judgment:IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1002 of 2008 Saluka Purty Appellant -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand Respondent. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - Mr. R. P. Gupta, Advocate. For the State : - A.P.P. I.A. (Cr.) No. 5584 of 2013 ... 05/13.08.2013 In this interlocutory application, the appellant, above named, has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than seven years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; in view of the period of long custody, the appellant deserves to be released on bail. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail but has not disputed the said contentions. Regard being had to the period of long custody, the appellant, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, during pendency of the appeal, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Singhbhum (W) at Chaibasa in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 121 of 2005/T.R. No. 133 of 2005. I.A. (Cr.) No. 5584 of 2013 is disposed of. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) (P.P. Bhatt, J.) APK