islam Mian ? Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1007583
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-13-2013
Appellantislam Mian ? Ansari
RespondentState of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. appeal (db) no. 132 of 2005 --- islam mian @ ansari ..... appellant versus the state of jharkhand ...... respondent --- coram: hon'ble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari honble mr. justice p.p.bhatt for the appellant : mr. shree nivas roy, advocate. for the respondent : a.p.p. - -- i.a. (cr.) no. 5729 of 2013 :07. 13.08.2013 in this interlocutory application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than ten years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future. learned a.p.p. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail but has not disputed the period of appellant's custody. regard being had to the period of custody, the appellant, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, during pendency of the appeal, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned additional sessions judge, fast track court no. viith, giridih in connection with sessions trial case no. 302/2003, arising out of bagodar p.s. case no. 62/2003 corresponding to g.r. case no. 710/2003. i.a.(cr.) no.5729 of 2013 is disposed of. (narendra nath tiwari, j.) anu/- (p.p. bhatt, j.)
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 132 of 2005 --- Islam Mian @ Ansari ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellant : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate. For the respondent : A.P.P. - -- I.A. (Cr.) No. 5729 of 2013 :

07. 13.08.2013 In this interlocutory application, the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected, he has remained in custody for more than ten years; there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for hearing in near future. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail but has not disputed the period of appellant's custody. Regard being had to the period of custody, the appellant, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, during pendency of the appeal, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. VIIth, Giridih in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 302/2003, arising out of Bagodar P.S. Case No. 62/2003 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 710/2003. I.A.(Cr.) No.5729 of 2013 is disposed of. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Anu/- (P.P. Bhatt, J.)