Douglas Vs. Wainwright - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/100639
SubjectCompany
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnApr-22-1963
Case Number372 U.S. 779
AppellantDouglas
RespondentWainwright
Excerpt:
douglas v. wainwright - 372 u.s. 779 (1963) u.s. supreme court douglas v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 779 (1963) 372 u.s. 779 douglas v. wainwright, corrections director. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of florida. no. 219, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and george r. georgieff, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 779, 780
Judgment:
DOUGLAS v. WAINWRIGHT - 372 U.S. 779 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DOUGLAS v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 779 (1963) 372 U.S. 779

DOUGLAS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 219, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 779, 780