Atchley Vs. California - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/100109
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnMay-01-1961
Case Number366 U.S. 207
AppellantAtchley
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
atchley v. california - 366 u.s. 207 (1961) u.s. supreme court atchley v. california, 366 u.s. 207 (1961) 366 u.s. 207 atchley v. california. certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 95. argued april 25, 1961. decided may 1, 1961. certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record. reported below: 53 cal. 2d 160, 346 p.2d 764. rosalie s. asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. doris h. maier, deputy attorney general of california, argued the cause for respondent. with her on the briefs was stanley mosk, attorney general of california. per curiam. after hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. accordingly, the writ is dismissed. page 366 u.s. 207, 208
Judgment:
ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA - 366 U.S. 207 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961) 366 U.S. 207

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764.

Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Page 366 U.S. 207, 208